mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 219

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

c3 in GC (→GE) & EE2

No c3 in chord in FE (→EE1)
..

The absence of the c3 note in the 2nd chord is certainly an oversight of the engraver of FE (→EE1) – the note is present in respective bar 31, whereas the recapitulation was most probably not written out in [A]. Similarly in the next bar.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE

b. 219

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

No mark in the sources

Accent suggested by the editors
..

As in bar 31, in the main text we suggest an accent in line with the analogous bar 11.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 219

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I

No marks in the sources

Staccato marks suggested by the editors
..

In the main text we suggest adding staccato signs after analogous bar 91.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 219-220

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I

2 slurs in GC (literal reading→GE)

Continuous slur in GC (contextual interpretation) & FE→EE)
..

The version of GE probably results from a misinterpretation of the notation of GC – in this manuscript, b. 219 ends a great stave, and the slur, due to the discontinuation of ink flow, is poorly visible, hence it seems that it does not go beyond the last crotchet. However, the slur in b. 220 very clearly suggests continuation, which is confirmed by a continuous slur in FE (→EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GC , Uncertain slur continuation

b. 219

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I

..

The  raising c2 to c2 at the end of bar appears only in FESch (written in), FE4 and EE2. The absence of this accidental constitutes an undoubted oversight by Chopin in [A] – cf. e2 and not e2 in an analogous passage in bars 91-92.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Authentic corrections of FE , Annotations in FESch