|
b. 8
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
The missing c1 in FE1 is most probably an oversight by the copyist or by the engraver. The mistake was corrected – most probably at Chopin's request – in FE2 (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
|
b. 8-9
|
composition: Op. 49, Fantaisie in F minor
..
In A in bar 8, which ends the line, the slur reaches only the f2 semiquaver, which does not correspond to the slur at the beginning of bar 9, which clearly suggests that it should be continued. All the remaining sources include a continuous slur here. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Source & stylistic information issues: Uncertain slur continuation , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||
|
b. 8
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A |
||||||||
|
b. 8
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
|
b. 8
|
composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt II
..
The staccato marks over the R.H. chords are rather wedges in A, and this is how they were interpreted in GE (→FE,EE,IE). By contrast, the marks in the L.H. part must be dots, hence reproducing them as wedges seems wrong. According to us, the change of dynamics corresponds with milder articulation, hence it is more likely that the chords were marked inaccurately. Therefore, we consider the literal interpretation of A and the solution suggested in the main text to be potentially authentic. category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Wedges , Inaccuracies in A |
in 
