|
b. 285
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we give the long accents of A. In the editions they were reproduced inaccurately as short ones. The differences in the number of accents are a result of oversights and revisions. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Inaccuracies in GE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 285-286
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 285
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The version of FE (→EE) is most probably a Terzverschreibung error – in the recapitulation A has an almost unchanged accompaniment, with respect to the exposition, in the entire theme (from bar 273); there are also no visible traces of correction in print in FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error |
|||||||||
|
b. 285-289
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text we give the cresc. written in bar 285 in A and extended by dashes to the end of bar 289 (we suggest to extend the dashes to the end of bar 290 so that they lead to a natural point, which in this case is category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE |
|||||||||
|
b. 285
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing slur in FE (→GE1→GE2) must be an oversight of the engraver (or of Chopin in [A]) – cf. all 7 similar bars. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
before e
2 in bar 285 and a 
before G in bar 286.
in bar 291). The repetition of the indication present in 
