mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 200-202

composition: (Op. 4), Sonata in C minor, Mvt IV

No fingering in A (→GE→FE,IE)

Fingering in EE1

Fingering in EE2
..

In the main text, we do not include the inauthentic R.H. fingering added by EE in bars 200 and 202. In EE1, the digit above g2 in bar 200 is either wrong or placed above the incorrect note. In EE2 it has been removed.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 201

composition: Op. 43, Tarantella

..

We add  to c in the LH part following EE and GE. Its lack only in this place of the whole phrase would not be justified. Moreover, we look at the correctly written out repetition of this part in b. 217 and c1 in RH.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , GE revisions

b. 201

composition: Op. 43, Tarantella

 
 
 
 
..

Given g in the previous and next bars, we may assume that also the middle note of the chord in the second half of b. 25 was intended by Chopin to be g and he must have overlooked . However, the g version is no less musically satisfactory, and so, assuming Chopin did not make a mistake, we provide this version for the main text.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals

b. 201

composition: Op. 43, Tarantella

..

We add cautionary  before c1 on the second half of the bar. Similar addition was made in EE.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: EE revisions

b. 201-207

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

cresc. in GC (→GE)

cresc. in EE

 

cresc. - - - in FE
..

In EE and FE the indication cresc. was placed under the hairpin mark . This is probably the revision introduced by editors, who could fear that the authentic notation (i.e. cresc. within the hairpin) preserved in GC and GE would prove illegible in print. Moreover, in FE the scope of the cresc. is delimited with dashes stretching until the end of bar 207, which seems to be a misunderstanding (cf. bar 211). As our main text we reproduce the authentic notation of GC (→GE), so characteristic of Chopin.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , FE revisions