



b. 200
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
In FE this bar is identical to b. 56. The version of EE and GE is most probably an earlier version of this place, changed by Chopin in the last stage of proofreading of FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 200-206
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The prototype of these bars – to the 1st beat of b. 206 – is the first phrase of AImaz, a draft autograph constituting an additional source of the Polonaise. In this autograph, the fragment is written down half a tone lower, in E category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information |
|||||
b. 200-203
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
As in bars 128-131, in A the L.H. octaves are written down in an abridged manner with the use of con 8va. In the editions the octaves were written out in full. The absence of this indication in AsI could be merely a simplification of notation. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions; Source & stylistic information issues: GE revisions , Bass register changes , Abbreviated octaves' notation |
|||||
b. 200-202
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The semiquavers appearing in bars 200 and 202 in AsI are the original version, since dotted rhythms appear both in A and editions, as well as in printed orchestral parts. However, in the orchestra part of AsI, the situation is not so clear. Its notation in bars 200-202 is short – only the part of the first violins and cellos with double basses and "as above" repeated several times, which probably refers to the previous Tutti. In bar 200, the violin part has a dotted rhythm (written incorrectly, perhaps added in a hurry), and the bass part has a semiquaver rhythm. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Chopin's hesitations , Main-line changes |
|||||
b. 200
|
composition: Op. 12, Variations in B♭ major
..
The missing slur must be due to Chopin's inadvertence or the FE engraver's oversight (→EE). The slur added in GE could be coming from Chopin, yet such an addition could have also been performed by the reviser. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |