|
b. 198-200
|
composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I
..
The slurs in GC were corrected, almost certainly by Chopin, who added a clear ending of the slur in b. 198 and a beginning in b. 199; however, he did not delete the fragment of the original, continuous slur (which became superfluous). It is difficult to say whether this was the reason why this correction was not included in GE – according to us, the intention to separate the slurs is unquestionable here. The notation of FE (→EE) is ambiguous – the slur in b. 198 (at the end of the line) suggests continuation; however, there is no doubt that a new slur starts in b. 199. We interpret it literally as separated slurs, yet it is likely that the engraver meant a continuous slur, which, judging from the original version of GC, was probably in [A]. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE |
|||||
|
b. 198
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In A there is no accidental before the 10th semiquaver. Chopin's patent oversight was corrected already in GE1 (→FE→EE, →GE2), by adding a category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Errors of A |
|||||
|
b. 198
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
In the sources the only cautionary sign in this bar is a category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Cautionary accidentals |
|||||
|
b. 198
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
In EE, a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 198
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The version of A (→FE→EE) is the original one, probably left inadvertently, and changed by Chopin in FC (→GE). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FC |
restoring b
1.
was added before f
2, poorly justified in this context.
