mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 196

composition: Op. 43, Tarantella

 
 
..

In IE and A there is no accent on the first beat of the bar. In IE it may have been omitted but in A this part is illegible due to the charred manuscript, so we cannot be certain whether Chopin notated an accent here or not. We can assume however that in A the accent was notated as it can be found in all the remaining sources.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

b. 196-197

composition: Op. 43, Tarantella

..  

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

b. 196

composition: Op. 43, Tarantella

..

Almost the whole RH part in b. 196 is illegible due to the charred manuscript A. We can deduce it content based on the corresponding b. 212 and FC3.

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness

b. 196

composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor

No sign in EE & FE

 in GC (→GE)
..

The asterisk  is only present on GC (→GE). Its absence in the remajning sources is doubtless due to oversight, probably on the part of Chopin himself. Cf. bar. 240.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Errors in EE

b. 196

composition: Op. 42, Waltz in A♭ major

c2 in FE0 (→FE,EE,FEG→GE)

a1 in GE2 (→GE3)
..

At the beginning of the bar FE (→FEG→GE1,EE) has a c2, which is most probably a characteristic error of the engraver (the so-called Terzverschreibung). In analogous bar 24 in all sources there is an a1 note. A respective correction was introduced in GE2 (→GE3).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions