|
b. 225
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The slur of A, although it ends slightly earlier, is certainly supposed to embrace the entire semiquaver figuration in the L.H. in this bar and this is how it was reproduced in GE2. The division of the slur in GE1 may be a facilitation used by the engraver (in order to avoid a long slur of an atypical shape) or a proofreading, if initially it was only the bottom slur that was printed. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 225
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The oversight of category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
|
b. 225
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
Chopin precisely added accidentals in this bar, together with cautionary naturals before a1 (twice – in the R.H. in the marked place and in the L.H. at the end of the bar) and g2. The first of them seems to be superfluous in this place and it was removed already in GE2. In the main text we add a category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
|||||
|
b. 225-226
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
Three naturals are missing in A – before the bottom note of the 1st octave in bar 225 and before the last quaver in bar 225 (a1) and 226 (b1). These patent inaccuracies were corrected in GE (→FE→EE). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Accidentals in different octaves , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in A |
|||||
|
b. 225-227
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The division of the slur into 3 parts – contrary to the unmistakable notation of A – is an example of a characteristic manner of the engraver of GE1, who avoided long slurs. GE2 restored the notation of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
in 
before a
2. 
