mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 225

composition: Op. 43, Tarantella

..

In IE there is no  lowering f1 to f1 in the LH part.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

b. 225-252

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

..

In GC the bars are not written out – see the note in bar 189. 

category imprint: Source & stylistic information

issues: Abbreviated notation of A

b. 225

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

e in GC (→GE) & FE1 (→FE2,EE1)

e in FE3 (→FE4) & EE2
..

The change of e to e is undoubtedly a result of Chopin proofreading of FE3 (→FE4).

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: EE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 225

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt II

No slur end in GC (→GE) & FE

Slur ending in EE
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions

b. 225

composition: Op. 35, Sonata in B♭ minor, Mvt I

Staccato dot in GC

No mark in FE (→EE) & GE
..

There is no reason to doubt the authenticity of the staccato dot which could have been written by Chopin into GC or even occur already in [A], but be overlooked by the engraver of FE. The lack of the sign in GE is certainly an oversight.

category imprint: Differences between sources