b. 222
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the main text we give the version of all sources. However, the comparison with identical – except this detail – bars 214 and 238 suggests that it could be Chopin's mistake, since there are no musical reasons for complicating the performance of these 3 bars with such an insignificant difference. Due to the above, we suggest an alternative version, compliant with the indicated, analogous bars. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Errors of A |
|||||
b. 223-224
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella
..
In GE3 (>GE4) es2 is tied over to the next bar. In A and FC3 there is a tiny tie on the chord in the second half of b. 223 that must have been left by Chopin by mistake as continuation from previous markings. It does not resemble any of the ties Chopin used. The slur in GE3 (>GE4) is either an arbitrary revision of this editon or - if it was also present in [FC1] - a mistakenly interpreted tie, as described above. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccurate slurs in A , GE revisions |
|||||
b. 223
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella
..
In →FE (→IE) an accent on the first beat of the bar was omitted. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||
b. 223
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella
..
In FE the second note in the LH part is erroneously a crotchet instead of quaver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE |
|||||
b. 223
|
composition: Op. 39, Scherzo in C♯ minor
..
The fact that is missing both from EE and from GC (→GE) suggests that the asterisk was already omitted in the autograph. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Errors of GC |