Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 162-166

composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III

R.H. dots in A

No mark in GE1 (→FEEE)

Dots in bar 166 in GE2

..

No staccato dots over the first quavers in bars 162 and 166 is certainly an oversight of the engraver of GE1 (→FEEE). The mistake was partially corrected in GE2, by adding a dot in bar 162 (also in the L.H.).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 162

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Semiquavers b1-a1 in FE, literal reading

Semiquavers b1-a1 in FE, contextual interpretation

Demisemiquavers b1-a1 in GE

Semiquaver a1 in EE

Semiquavers a1-g1 in FED

..

The rhythm of the 1st beat of the bar, written in FE with a mistake, allows for two natural ways of correcting it – changing semiquavers to demisemiquavers, which was performed in GE, or shortening the first note, like it was corrected in FED. We consider the latter to be more likely, corresponding to the alignment of the notes with respect to the quavers in the L.H. and confirmed by the authority of FED.

Apart from the correction of the rhythmic error, the entry in FED changes also the pitch of the 2nd and 3rd notes from b1-a1 to a1-g1. This can be regarded as an alternative version to the printed text (variant); however, according to us, it is also a correction of a mistake.

We can only guess how the version of EE came into being; however, nothing proves that it could correspond to Chopin's final intention.

In the main text, we give the version of FED, corrected during a lesson with Chopin both rhythmically and melodically. The version is compliant with the unquestionable version of analogous bar 517.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED , GE revisions , Rhythmic errors

b. 162

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Fingering written into FED

No teaching fingering

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED

b. 162

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

Quaver e in sources

Minim suggested by the editors

..

In the main text, we suggest holding the bass note, like it was marked by Chopin in analogous bar 518.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 162

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I

..

The differences in the number and pitch of the notes following the first bare discussed in the previous note, together with rhythmic differences.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Annotations in FED , Authentic post-publication changes and variants