b. 214-215
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
It is difficult to imagine that Chopin, when proofreading GE1, could have added slurs in the L.H. in this form: the added slur, analogous with the slur in the R.H. (cf. the slur in GE2), was either reproduced in a simplified manner (GE1 avoided long slurs, requiring a precise adjustment) or it is simply an editorial revision. Since in such a context the slur over the R.H. is valid also for the L.H., in the main text we leave the notation of A. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 214
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 214
|
composition: Op. 19, Bolero category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 214-216
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The ties of b in bar 214 and a in bar 216, very carefully written in A, were nonetheless reproduced in GE1 (→FE→EE) as d1-e1 and c1-d1 slurs. In GE2 the first of them was arbitrarily moved, so that it combines f1 and e1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 214-216
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt III
..
The signs under the chords in the L.H. in bars 214 and 216 in A are typical long accents. In GE (→FE→EE) the first of them was reproduced as a short accent, whereas the second one as a . In GE2 the latter was shortened – most probably after A – so it can be considered a long accent. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |