|
b. 192-194
|
composition: Op. 21, Concerto in F minor, Mvt I
..
The slurs of A (our main text), showing precisely the phrasing of the melody in the topmost voice, was replaced in GE1 with slurs embracing entire bars. It is a characteristic example of a schematic and disrespectful approach of the engraver of this edition to Chopin slurs. The authentic slurs (except for the ending of the slur in bar 194) were restored in GE2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in GE , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 192-193
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt I
..
The missing slur must be an inaccuracy – slurs are present over all previous appearances of similar figures as well as in the analogous place in the recapitulation (bars 547-548). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 192
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing slur in the R.H. is a patent mistake of FE, corrected in the remaining editions. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 192
|
composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major
..
We add a cautionary category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
|
b. 192
|
composition: Op. 22, Polonaise
..
The 1st note written in the treble clef in GE is an erroneous d2 instead of b category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error |
before d1 in the main text. In a similar context one octave lower (bar 194), a corresponding 
1.