mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 179-180

composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major

..

The R.H. part underwent substantial changes in A, mainly rhythmical. Interestingly, it is possible to decipher the deleted versions with high probability. Chopin started with the following:. Subsequently, this was slightly modified by removing the penultimate semiquaver in bar 179:. Analogous transformations were applied in bars 183-184.

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Main-line changes

b. 179-181

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

..

In the main text we add cautionary flats before the E1 and E grace notes in b. 179 and before the D1-D octave in b. 181. The signs in b. 181 were added already in GE, those in b. 179 – in GE2 (→GE3).
There is an identical situation in b. 630-632.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: GE revisions

b. 179-180

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

 in A (→FE)

No markings in FC (→GE)

   & L.H. slur in EE

   suggested by the editors
..

The missing  mark after , present in A (→FE) in b. 179, could be considered a common inaccuracy resulting from distraction caused by the transition into a new page of the manuscript. However, an identical situation is to be found in A in analogous b. 630; since both places are devoid of pedalling markings in FC (→GE), both  marks were probably added in A after FC had been finished. Therefore, Chopin could have considered the  marks to be clear enough while completing A. On the other hand, the  mark, added – probably by Chopin – in FE (→EE) at the end of b. 631, suggests that the decision was changed (or that the inaccurate notation, perhaps introduced in haste, was completed). Due to the above reason, in the main text we add a  mark also in b. 180. EE performed a far-reaching revision: apart from adding a , the slur placed by Chopin over the parts of both hands was doubled under the bottom stave. 

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Corrections in A , No pedal release mark , Errors of FC , Inaccuracies in A

b. 179-180

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

No ties in A (→FC→GE1, →FE→EE)

Slurs in GE2 (→GE3)
..

In the main text we add ties of the trilled minims after analogous b. 630-631. Both notations (with and without ties) indicate the same performance: cf. the note to the Waltz in D Major, Op. 64 No. 1, b. 69-72. The addition was also introduced in GE2 (→GE3).

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 179

composition: Op. 23, Ballade in G minor

Accent in A

No mark in FE (→GE,EE)

Our variant suggestion
..

In the case of a single small mark, a possible Chopinesque acceptance of its absence in FE (→GE,EE) is problematic; the absence of traces of corrections in print makes it unlikely for it to have been removed in the stage of proofreading (see the previous note in this bar). Due to the above, in the main text we suggest a variant solution, leaving the decision concerning its use to the performer's taste.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Errors in FE