|
b. 7-9
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
FCI contains much more accents – in bars 7 and 9, as well as 12, 16-18, 20 and 22. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||
|
b. 7-9
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
Nothing indicates that the fingering of EE could be authentic. What is more, a mistake was most probably committed in b. 8 – in the middle of the bar, the b-a notes should be, apparently, played with the fingers 2-1, as they were in the previous bar, in an analogous place. In the copied fingering, it is, however, impossible to reach d at the beginning of the 4th group without crossing the fingers, which should have been marked. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in EE |
||||||||
|
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
Arpeggio in EE resulted from a mistake of the engraver of EE1, who placed it in b. 7 instead of b. 8. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
||||||||
|
b. 7-10
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 3, Prelude in G major
..
An earlier version of slurring linked to the initial rhythm – see the note on rhythm. It is also there that we discuss the mistakes in the reproduction of the slurs of A, committed both in FC (→GE) and FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Errors in FE , Errors of FC |
||||||||
|
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 28 No. 6, Prelude in B minor
..
In the main text we include – in a variant form – the arpeggio added most probably by Chopin in FED. category imprint: Differences between sources |
