Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 115-116

composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor

No markings in A (→FCGE1)

One-bar pedalling in FE (→EE) & GE2 (→GE3)

Two-bar pedalling, our alternative suggestion

..

In the main text we give the pedalling added by Chopin in the proofreading of FE (→EE). In accordance with the observations expressed in the note to b. 65-76 on combining the bars based on the same chord with one pedal, one can assume that it was a routine operation of the composer, just like in a few other places, and that he did not consider a longer hold of pedal, more natural in this context. However, since analog. b. 247-248 are also provided with a pedal change, where the pedalling of FC was written independently, we suggest the version with a two-bar pedal only as an acceptable alternative solution.
GE2 (→GE3) added the markings probably on the basis of analog. b. 247-248.  

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 115

composition: Op. 22, Polonaise

..

In the main text we add a cautionary  before f2.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 115

composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor

Long accent in Af, probable interpretation

2 long accents in FE

L.H. short accent in EE

Short accent in GE

..

The two accents written in AF in analogous b. 19 and 111 have the characteristics that are frequently encountered in the notation of short accents – the mark tilted upwards and a relatively big angle between the arms. However, the mark in the discussed bar is less characteristic in this respect; therefore, we assume that it is a long accent. In FE (→EE) it was placed under the L.H. chord by mistake, which Chopin then corrected in the last stage of proofreading by adding a second accent under the R.H. triplet. According to us, the added accent – certainly long – tips the balance in favour of long accents in all analogous bars. The short accent in GE may be considered an alternative version. 

category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations

issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , Authentic corrections of FE

b. 115

composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor

Staccato dot in AF, GE & EE

No mark in FE

..

FE overlooked the staccato dot over the a quaver. The mark was added in EE, probably due to the dot under the L.H. octave and by analogy with, e.g. b. 111 and 113.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE

b. 115

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

..

In GE (→FE,EE,FESB) a cautionary  was added to the f1 quaver in the L.H. and to the 10th R.H. semiquaver, f2. The accidentals do not seem necessary here; we do not include them in the main text. 

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals