mUltimate Chopin

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 129-160

composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor

..

Placement of the  asterisks – see bars 1-32. Bars 131, 132, 142-143, 148, 158 and 160 were discussed separately. 

category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GE , Inaccuracies in FE , EE inaccuracies

b. 129-130

composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor

Longer  in A

Shorter  in FE (→GE,EEW1→EEW2)

No sign in EEC
..

Shortening the  hairpin in the editions is most probably a result of an inaccuracy of the engraver of FE. The absence of the sign in EEC is undoubtedly a mistake.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in EE

b. 129-130

composition: Op. 64 No 2, Waltz in C♯ minor

..

EEC overlooked the slur over the part of the R.H., which is certainly a mistake.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in EE

b. 129

composition: Op. 16, Rondo in E♭ major

Slur in FE (→GE)

EE1

EE2 (→EE3)
..

The slur, inaccurately reproduced in EE1, was revised in EE2 (→EE3) by adding a second one, which makes the slurring resemble the one that the sources contain in bar 127.

category imprint:

issues: EE revisions , EE inaccuracies

b. 129

composition: Op. 38, Ballade in F major

Slur from d1 in A (→FE,EE)

Slur from c in GC (→GE)
..

The earlier beginning of slur in GC (→GE) is an unintended result of a slight displacement of its origin.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Inaccuracies in GC