b. 7
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In the manuscripts there is no cautionary natural before g2. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals |
|||
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In the sources there are sharps reminding of the already previously marked raise of these notes before the 8th and 12th semiquavers – a2 and f2. We do not consider them in the main text, as the correct text results here from both the rules on accidentals' validity and the melodic context and fingering. The sharp before a2 is included in CLI, GE2 (→GE3) and EE4. The sharp before f2 is present in FE (→GE1→GE2→GE3,→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals |
|||
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
In Ap there is no returning a2 at the 9th semiquaver of the bar. It must have been Chopin's oversight. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Omissions to cancel alteration , Errors of A |
|||
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
The lack of raising g2 into g2 on the 10th semiquaver is probably an error of FE (→GE1,→EE2→EE3). It is worth mentioning that when interpreted literally, FEcor has g2 here, as the before the 2nd semiquaver of the bar is still valid (see the previous remark). Similarly, despite lack of the , g2 is featured in GE1 and GE4 (→GE5). The correctly written combination of the E minor triad on the 2nd beat of the bar and g2 in the described place appears only in Ap. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||
b. 7
|
composition: Op. 10 No 2, Etude in A minor
..
CLI has by mistake an A on the 3rd beat of the bar. Probably it was similar also at the beginning of the bar, yet in this situation the copyist realised the mistake and corrected the erroneous note. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors of CLI |