data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
Main text
compare
The missing articulation markings between the bars may be explained by an oversight by the copyist or by the engraver of FE or – which seems less likely in this case – by the markings having been added to A later. The fact that the marks were added by EE2 most probably resulted from using GE1 while revising.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions
notation: Slurs, Articulation, Accents, Hairpins