b. 3
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
The staccato dots for the 2nd chord are rather non-authentic. They were most probably added by the revisers, perhaps as a result of misinterpretation of A – one can see a minor fleck of ink between the beam and note head of the lowest note in the R.H. Moreover, the signs were added inconsistently: FE (→GE1) includes dots only the first time (in GE1 only over the R.H.), yet they are absent in the repetition. The revisers of EE and GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5) added dots in both situations. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , FE revisions |
|||||||
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 26 No 1, Polonaise in C♯ minor
..
The first time GE1 overlooked the staccato dot for the G-g octave in the L.H. (the sign was placed correctly in the repetition). The mistake was already corrected in GE2 (→GE3→GE4→GE5). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||||
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 25 No 7, Etude in C♯ minor
..
category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals |
|||||||
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 25 No 8, Etude in D♭ major
..
It is one of rare cases of Chopin's giving a clearly different fingering for the same fragment. In the main text we include them both – directly over the notes we give the fingering of FE, probably added by Chopin while proofreading (it does not include the 10th quaver of the bar); the fingering was then repeated in EE2 (→EE3). The top fingering, together with the numerals concerning the 9th and 10th sixth comes from A (→GE). In EE1 there is no fingering in this bar. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Differences in fingering , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||
b. 3
|
composition: Op. 25 No 8, Etude in D♭ major
..
GE1 has a g as the bottom note on the 6th quaver. The comparison with the remaining sources, featuring e, proves that the Terzverschreibung error was committed here, yet, on the basis of GE1, one could also suspect an omission of . category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error |