Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 55

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

Slur in A

No slur in GE (→FE,EE,FESB)

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 55

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

..

We add a cautionary  before e3 in the main text.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 55-57

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

No fingering in AsI & A (→GE1EE,FE)

Fingering in GE2 (→GE3,FESB)

..

In the main text we do not include the fingering added by GE2 (→GE3,FESB) due to its questionable authenticity. It is particularly the use of the 5th and 4th fingers in the 2nd figure in b. 56 and the 1st figure in b. 57 that is dubious – Chopin would repeat the 5th finger in similar contexts, e.g. in the Polonaise in E, Op. 22, b. 22. See also b. 57 and 58.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE

b. 55-61

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

Crotchets after minims in AsI & A (→GEFESB)

Crotchets and minims together in EE

Various rhythms in FE

..

Unlike in b. 16-17 and subsequent, GE arranged the L.H. notes correctly: it is clearly indicated that each of the 4 notes in each half-bar figure should be played separately (only at the beginning of b. 60 the second note – a dotted crotchet – is written too close to the minim, which could raise doubts if considered without the context of this entire fragment). In spite of that, FE combined the dotted crotchet with the minim in two places (at the beginning of b. 60 and at the beginning of b. 55), thus suggesting that they should be performed simultaneously (the same mistake was also committed at the beginning of b. 62). In FESB the L.H. arrangement is greatly inaccurate; however, the defects are due to carelessness, supposedly without influence on the understanding of the rhythmic structure of these bars. The boldest distortion is to be found in EE, in which in all places the dotted crotchets are combined with the preceding minims, which means that they are to be played simultaneously (also in b. 62).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in GE , FE revisions

b. 55

composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete

a-f1 quaver in AsI, contextual interpretation

a-f1 & f2 quavers in A (→GEFE,EE,FESB)

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources