b. 56
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In A and in all editions, over the 5-note 1st half of the figure on the 3rd beat of the bar, we can observe a seemingly wrong digit – 6. However, the error consists in a missing note – a2 between b2 and g2 – which is proven by:
The mistake remained unnoticed, both by Chopin (who was probably proofreading GE1 and certainly FE1) and by the revisers, who did not check the rhythmic correctness of this figure. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Rhythmic errors , Errors of A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |
||||||||
b. 56-57
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In both figures including rests, a hemidemisemiquaver beam was overlooked in FESB. Consequently, in each of these bars the R.H. has one too many hemidemisemiquavers. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FESB |
||||||||
b. 56-57
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Rhythmic errors , Main-line changes |
||||||||
b. 57
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The fingering added by GE2 (→GE3,FESB), although very natural in this bar, probably does not come from Chopin. It is indicated by the fingering entered into b. 55-56 and 58, probably by the same person yet less artful; more importantly, it is contrary to the Chopinesque fingering present in similar places in his other works. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of GE |
||||||||
b. 57-58
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |