



b. 343
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The version of GE (→EE,FESB) resulted from a mistake by the engraver of GE1, who did not notice that the B category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE |
||||||||
b. 343-347
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The version of AsI is the initial version of the markings, in this bar enhanced by Chopin, but in analogous bars used also in the published version. The change of accent type is a typical arbitrary decision of EE – a similar situation is to be found in bar 347. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions |
||||||||
b. 343
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
Both the absence of the m.s. indication in FE and it having been placed too early in FESB must be mistakes. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Errors in FESB |
||||||||
b. 343-348
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In bars 343-344 and 347-348 in both manuscripts Chopin used abbreviations to write down the repeated R.H. triplets. In AsI he wrote all triplets (except the first one) this way in each bar. In A the notation is very similar – it is only in bar 343 that the first three triplets are written out with notes. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Abbreviated notation of A |
||||||||
b. 345-346
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In both bars wedges instead of dots must have resulted from an ad hoc revision by the engraver of GE1, who unified these marks in the entire finale of the Variations. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , Wedges |