b. 357-358
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
As before (bars 343-348) in both manuscripts Chopin used abbreviations to write down repeated R.H. triplets. In AsI he wrote all triplets except the first one in each bar in this manner, while in A all except the first two in bar 357 (most probably due to the slurs) and the first one in bar 358. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Abbreviated notation of A |
|||||
b. 359
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
As in bar 345, the engraver of GE (→EE,FESB) erroneously reproduced the B-b octave in a normal font, which requires it to be included in the solo part. Chopin restored the correct notation in FE. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||
b. 359
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the main text we suggest hairpins under the L.H. motifs after three previous analogous bars 341, 345 and 355. Crescendos in such figures are one of the elements defining the shape of a motif, hence the absence of marks must be considered Chopin's oversight. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
b. 360
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
In the main text we suggest marks after analogous bar 346. Chopin wrote similar pairs of marks also in bars 342 and 356. According to us, these pairs of hairpins, as emphasising the brilliant nature of the bravura passages, are to be considered an integral part of notation. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
|||||
b. 361
|
composition: Op. 2, Variations, complete
..
The omission of the hairpin coupled with the cresc. indication was an arbitrary decision of the engraver of GE1. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |