Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
|
b. 284
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the main text we suggest the markings of FE for the chordal section starting from the syncopated crotchet; there is a possibility to add the staccato dot from GE in analogous b. 25. At the same time, we correct the third accent, which was misplaced, i.e. it was put over the first chord in b. 284 (which is tied!). EE1 repeated the mistake of FE and also overlooked the slur (which was added in EE2). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Errors in EE , Authentic corrections of FE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 309
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||||
|
b. 312
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
We explain the absence of markings in GE in b. 24-26. The missing staccato dots in EE must be an oversight of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 314-315
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the main text we include the accent and the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||||
|
b. 315
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
It is difficult to say how accurately the notation of the manuscripts was reproduced in the editions. Both versions are, of course, possible. In the main text we give the notation of FE (→EE) due to the Chopinesque additions to the dynamic markings in this and the previous bar, introduced at the stage of proofreading of FE. The absence of the mark in GE2 is most probably an oversight. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents |
in 
