



Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
b. 20
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The lack of hairpin The lack of hairspin category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||||
b. 24-25
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the main text we rely on the indications of FE (→EE) introduced into [FC] (the Stichvorlage) or in the proofreading stage of FE1, and certainly later than the markings of GE. Anyway, both sets differ very little and can be considered complementary, which we include as a variant possibility. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
b. 24-26
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
GE2 arbitrarily repeated in the L.H. part the accents and dots placed below or above the R.H. part. However, the last accent in bar 24 was omitted (also overlooked in the R.H.) as well as the staccato dot under Fis1 on the 3rd beat of bar 26. The addition was related to the entire R.H. part having been placed on the upper staff. The authentic layout in this kind of homogenous texture clearly suggest applying marks put over the R.H. to all underlying notes. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
|||||||||
b. 26
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
The missing staccato dots at the end of the bar in FE (→EE) are supposedly an oversight of the copyist or of the engraver. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE |
|||||||||
b. 50-52
|
composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor
..
In the main text we suggest the markings of FE (→EE) for the chordal section (beginning with the syncopated crotchet); it is possible to supplement them with the staccato dot drawn from GE (present in analogous b. 25). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Authentic corrections of FE |