Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 315

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

Long accent in GE1

Short accent in FE (→EE)

No mark in GE2

..

It is difficult to say how accurately the notation of the manuscripts was reproduced in the editions. Both versions are, of course, possible. In the main text we give the notation of FE (→EE) due to the Chopinesque additions to the dynamic markings in this and the previous bar, introduced at the stage of proofreading of FE. The absence of the mark in GE2 is most probably an oversight.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Long accents

b. 316

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

Short accent in sources

Long accent suggested by the editors

..

In the main text we suggest a long accent due to the context, typical of such an accent, i.e. a long, syncopated note. In the absence of preserved manuscripts, we cannot verify whether this detail is compliant with the notation of [A], while in Chopin's pieces we encounter numerous examples of inaccuracies (sometimes quite manifest) in the reproduction of long accents by the editions (cf., e.g. the Prelude in F minor, Op. 28 No. 8, b. 1-2). 

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Long accents

b. 319

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

dimin. in GE

No indication in FE (→EE)

dim. suggested by the editors

..

Chopin would use the dim. abbreviation much more frequently than dimin.; therefore, it is likely that the Viennese publisher changed it arbitrarily (the change does not affect the meaning of the indication). The composer could have entered it into [A] after Fontana had finished [FC]. Alternatively, it could have been overlooked in the basis for FE (→EE) or in the edition itself. Anyways, there are no reasons to doubt its authenticity, hence we give it in the main text.

category imprint: Differences between sources

b. 319

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

Pedalling in GE

No markings in FE (→EE)

Pedalling suggested by the editors

..

According to us, holding changing chords on one pedal, as marked in GE, cannot correspond to Chopin's intention in this context. Therefore, it is probably a mistake of the engraver or even of Chopin himself, who, when adding, probably in a hurry, the pedaling in [A], could take into account only the bass note. Due to the above reason, in the main text we suggest supple­ment­ing this pedalling accordingly.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Inaccuracies in GE

b. 320

composition: Op. 44, Polonaise in F♯ minor

2 triads in GE & EE2 (→EE3)

3 triads in FE

Sixth on the 6th quaver of the bar in EE1

..

The versions of GE and FE can be considered equal variants, since each of them may be authentic; moreover, it seems impossible to determine their chronology. In the main text we give the version of FE, our principal source. The version of EE1 is most probably a mistake of the engraver, revised in EE2 (→EE3).

category imprint: Differences between sources