|
b. 160
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella
..
In all the sources except FC3 the chord on the second beat is written out as a crotchet with a quaver rest. In FC3 there are a rest and augmentation dot but only on the upper note of the chord. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FC |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 160
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella
..
In IE, as a result of an obvious error, the second beat of RH is moved up by a third. In the middle voice there are no augmentation dots. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Terzverschreibung error |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 160-163
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella
..
In the sources bars 160 - 163 are slurred differently. The FE (-IE) variant and EE may result from the imprecise notation of FC3. The GE must be a free interpretation, and yet here we also find differences - in the first three impressions there are only two slurs on the two beats of b. 161. Only in GE4 a slur on the second beat of b. 160 and a slur on bars 162-163 were added.
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions , FE revisions |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 161
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella
..
In A there are no augmentation dots on the c1-e category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions |
|||||||||||||
|
b. 161
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
1 third at the beginning of b. 153 (and also 161, marked as repeat). The corresponding b. 149 (157) is illegible due to the charred manuscript, and threre are no reasons to differentiate them, in which case all augmentation dots in 
before f1 in RH. In