b. 20
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella
..
In A bars 20-35 are contained between repeat signs, while bars 36-51 are not written out. See description of A. category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 22
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella
..
In A, FC3, GE1 (→GE2→GE3) diminishing g1 to g1 in RH was omitted. (in the corresponding bars 30 and 198 the marking is correct). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources |
|||||
b. 23-24
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella
..
In all sources the slur over the phrase in bars 20-27 is divided at the bar line of bars 23-24 on the tied c1-e1 chord. Here we write down one slur as in the corresponding part in bars 199-200. category imprint: Interpretations within context |
|||||
b. 24
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella
..
In A there is no dot increasing the length of the note c1. In this context it has to be regarded as an inaccuracy. Similarily in bar 40. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Cautionary accidentals |
|||||
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 43, Tarantella
..
Given that there is g in both the previous and following bars, we are led to believe tha the internal note of the chord in the second half of b. 25 per Chopin’s intention should also be g, and its omission must have been Chopin’s oversight. The version with g is no less satisfactory in musical terms, so if we assume there is no error in Chopin’s notation, we have proposed it for the main text. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources; Source & stylistic information |