|
b. 9-24
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
In AI the only pedalling marking is in b. 91. Therefore, the absence of pedalling does not constitute an actual performance variant; it simply proves that the manuscript is unfinished. Due to the above reason, in the entire Mazurka we give the version of AI only when at least one of the remaining sources is lacking in pedalling markings. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
|
b. 9-15
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
There are no staccato dots in b. 9, 11 and 13-15 in AI. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
|
b. 9
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE , Errors in GE |
||||||
|
b. 10-12
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
We reproduce the short category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Placement of markings , FE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 10-11
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 3, Mazurka in C♯ minor
..
The missing slur in GE is a result of inadvertence, perhaps of the engraver, since this edition features slurs in an analogous motif in b. 11-13. The slur of FE (→EE) is inaccurate and misleading – it looks like a tie of f category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Tie or slur |
hairpins in b. 10 and 12, whose nature is clearly the one of long accents, after 
1.