|
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
Like in b. 19-20, in the main text we give the pedalling of GE in a variant form; it could have been written by Chopin in haste. The same applies to b. 56 and 100. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||||
|
b. 25
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
The cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Cautionary accidentals , FE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 28-29
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
In the main text we take into consideration the slur of GE, added almost certainly by Chopin in [A2] or in the proofreading of GE1. See also b. 36-37. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations |
||||||||
|
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
Both accents in A1 are undoubtedly long accents, which was not reproduced in FE (→EE). In GE1 it is only the mark in the L.H. that can be considered a long accent; however, according to us, a shorter accent in the R.H. is almost certainly an inaccuracy of notation, even if it was somehow justified in the notation of [A2]. GE2 unified the accents and considered the longer mark in the L.H. to be inaccurate. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 29
|
composition: Op. 50 No. 2, Mazurka in A♭ major
..
The version of EE is a double Terzverschreibung, committed in FE, in which Chopin corrected it in the last stage of proofreading (it is proven by evident traces of correction in print). category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , Authentic corrections of FE |
before e
1 was added in the first stage of proofreading of 
