b. 592-624
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we add dots under the L.H. chords in b. 592, 600, 616 and 624, after those in the R.H. category imprint: Editorial revisions |
||||||||
b. 592-624
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
Among the R.H. chords in b. 592, 600, 616 and 624, it is only the one in b. 600 that is provided with an unequivocal staccato mark (dot) in A (and in the remaining sources). B. 592 could also contain a dot; however, the potential mark is quite far from the chord and blends with the end of the slur; it was repeated neither in FC nor in FE. The missing marks are most probably an inaccuracy, hence in the main text we suggest dots in all four places. Such an addition was also introduced in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Graphic ambiguousness; Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Inaccuracies in FC , Inaccuracies in A |
||||||||
b. 596
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
Just like in b. 13 and 145, in the main text we add cautionary flats. The addition was already introduced in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 597-598
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In accordance with the analysis of the Chopinesque or marks in this and analogous pairs of bars (see b. 6-7), in the main text we give the averaged, more or less one-bar hairpin of FC and FE (→EE). According to us, all hairpins, regardless of their actual length, are to be interpreted as long accents. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Scope of dynamic hairpins , GE revisions , Inaccuracies in FC |
||||||||
b. 599-623
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FC |