|
b. 524-525
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The mark crossed out in A on the 2nd beat of bar 524 is most probably a crotchet rest. It means that initially the L.H. part was the same as in b. 516 (except for the enharmonic difference in the notation). category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Accompaniment changes |
||||||||
|
b. 527
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In A the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Deletions in A |
||||||||
|
b. 528-539
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
Chopin added a 12-bar crescendo both in FC (→GE) and FE (→EE). In the main text we reproduce the notation of FC, in which the word cresc. appears in b. 528 slightly earlier (anyway, in the case of such a long dynamic change it does not actually matter). See also b. 540. category imprint: Differences between sources; Corrections & alterations issues: Authentic corrections of FE , Authentic corrections of FC |
||||||||
|
b. 528-532
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we add cautionary naturals before the D-d octave in b. 528 and E-e in b. 532. The accidentals were also added in GE2 (→GE3). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 531-536
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In b. 531 and 535 in the main text we give the unequivocal whole-bar slurs of A (→FC→GE). However, the longer slurs of FE (→EE) are probably a result of Chopin's proofreading: there is no visible reason for which the engraver would have complicated his work with asymmetrical slurs. Therefore, they can be considered an equivalent variant. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Authentic corrections of FE |
-e1 sixth could have been added later, which is indicated by the spaces between the notes.
at end of bar in 
marks. It was probably the reason for its omission in 
