data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
EE1
compare
In A the mark is at the end of the page, squeezed above the deleted
marks. It was probably the reason for its omission in FE. The mark was added in EE at the end of the R.H. passage.
Compare the passage in the sources »
category imprint: Differences between sources
issues: EE revisions, Errors in FE, Deletions in A
notation: Pedalling