b. 521
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
FE overlooked the lowering c3 to c3. The mistake was rectified in EE and in two teaching copies, FED and FESf. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , Errors in FE , Annotations in FED , Annotations in FESf |
|||||
b. 521-522
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The crossings-out visible in A allow us to reconstruct the previous version of the 2nd and 4th chords: . The textural affinity with the motifs in b. 516-518 allows us to assume that it was the original version. category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Corrections in A , Deletions in A , Accompaniment changes |
|||||
b. 522
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The natural lowering g2 to g2, written in ink in FESf, defines a version that, according to us, may be considered a potentially authentic variant:
category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Authentic post-publication changes and variants , Annotations in FESf |
|||||
b. 523
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
According to us, the longer slur of FC is an inaccuracy of the copyist, hence in the main text we give the whole-bar slur of A. We consider the other possibility – the slur having been added in FC by Chopin – to be less likely (see, however, b. 531-536). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FC |
|||||
b. 524
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
The authenticity of the slur of FC (→GE) is not excluded, yet it is highly unlikely, according to us. category imprint: Differences between sources |