



Pitch
b. 482
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
There are no reasons to believe the version of EE to be authentic. Therefore, the disturbance of the pianistic regularity of the passages, unjustified in terms of harmony, must be a mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in EE |
|||||
b. 490-491
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In A one can see in these bars 4 minor crossings-out. All concern cautionary accidentals that Chopin, after a moment of reflection, considered superfluous. The accidentals in the L.H. part – category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information issues: Cautionary accidentals , Deletions in A |
|||||
b. 492
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In the main text we add a cautionary category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Annotations in teaching copies , GE revisions , Cautionary accidentals , Deletions in A , Annotations in FESf |
|||||
b. 493
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In A (→FC→GE1, →FE→EE1) there is no accidental before the last crotchet in the R.H. It must be a mistake, cf., e.g. analogous b. 497. Oversight of an accidental necessary for writing a note belonging to a currently valid key is one of Chopin's most frequent mistakes. A natural was added only just in GE2 (→GE3) and EE2 (→EE3); it was also added in FESf. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , EE revisions , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE , Annotations in FESf |
|||||
b. 494
|
composition: Op. 31, Scherzo in B♭ minor
..
In A (→FE,FC→GE1) there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors of A , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in FE , Errors repeated in EE |