Issues : Errors in GE
b. 373-374
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FE, the slurring of these bars is inaccurate – the slur in the 2nd half of bar 373 ends between the penultimate and the last semiquaver, whereas in bar 374, on a new line of text, there is a slur, reaching the 1st quaver, suggesting continuation from the previous bar. We consider the interpretation adopted in EE to be the text of FE, while the version of GE may be considered an alternative interpretation. As the 2nd triplet in bar 373 left without slur is also questionable, in the main text we suggest a slurring modelled after analogous bars 377-378. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in GE , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||
b. 391
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
Moving the slur under the stave was certainly caused by graphic issues. The absence of the slur in GE3 can be explained by an oversight or revision. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Placement of markings , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||||
b. 392
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing first slur must be an oversight of GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 400
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing is most probably an oversight of the engraver of GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||||
b. 405
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The sharp added in GE3 is probably a mistake – it was supposed to be a cautionary before d3 in the 1st triplet of the next bar. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |