Issues : Errors in GE
|
b. 299
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing slur in GE1 (→GE2) is probably an oversight of the engraver. A shorter slur was added in GE3 on the basis of comparison with analogous bar 71 or with the part of violins I in FEorch (→GEorch). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
||||||
|
b. 299
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The accent in GE is a revision or a mistake, which, according to us, is more likely. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||
|
b. 359
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The version of GE is most probably a Terzverschreibung error – cf. similar bar 367. A mistake can be provoked by both f category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in GE , Terzverschreibung error |
||||||
|
b. 363
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The omitted accents must be a mistake of GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||
|
b. 369-370
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FE (→GE1→GE2), the tie of F1 is present only in bar 169 (at the end of the line). EE corrected the patent defect, whereas GE3 completely omitted the tie, which is probably a mistake. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE , Uncertain slur continuation , Errors repeated in GE |
in 
before that note in 
