mUltimate Chopin

Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Text Compare Notes Sources Description

Issues : Errors in GE

b. 204

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Slur from semiquaver in FE

No slur in GE1 (→GE2)

Slur from quaver in EE & GE3
..

In the 1st half of the bar, FE has different slurs for the R.H. and for the L.H. We unify them in the main text by changing the slur in the L.H. after the slur in the R.H. A similar change was introduced in EE and GE3; in turn, the missing slur in the L.H. in GE1 (→GE2) is almost certainly a mistake.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 208-209

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

 in FE (→EE)

 in bar 209 in GE1 (→GE2)

Shifted  in GE3
..

A later beginning of the ​​​​​​​ mark in GE1 (→GE2) must be an inaccuracy resulting from having divided these bars into two great staves. GE3 prolonged the mark yet did not repeat its range from FE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions , EE inaccuracies

b. 212

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Accent in FE (→EE)

No mark in GE
..

The missing accent in GE is probably an oversight of the engraver of GE1, although the mark could have also been added only just in the last proofreading of FE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 214

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

..

GE1 (→GE2) overlooked the crotchet stem prolonging d​​​​​​​ at the beginning of the bar.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions

b. 228-229

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Wedges in FE (→EE)

No marks in GE
..

The missing staccato wedges in GE most probably result from distraction of the engraver of GE1 – he overlooked also three slurs in this bar as well as a note in bar 230.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE