Issues : Errors in GE
|
b. 60
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
GE features an erroneous rhythm on the 2nd quaver of the bar, i.e. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , Rhythmic errors |
|||||
|
b. 62
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
A possible oversight of the engraver of GE1 is proven by a comparison with analogous bar 290, in which all sources feature a b1-d category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
|
b. 66
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In GE1, the 2nd quaver in the L.H. is a c category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||
|
b. 96
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing wedge in GE must be an oversight. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
|||||
|
b. 100
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing staccato dots in the R.H. part in GE1 (→GE2) are a patent oversight of the engraver, completed in GE3. It is probably the response of oversight of dots, which occurred in FE in the next bar – in both editions, dots were overlooked in the bar ending a line of text (101 in FE, 100 in GE). category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
– one beam is missing.
2 third. The lack of traces of corrections in 
before that note, totally unjustified before c
