b. 237
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
According to us, leaving the 1st triplet without slur is a clear inaccuracy of notation, probably committed by the engraver of FE, although inaccurate slurs of [A] are also likely. The slurs can be corrected by prolonging the slur in bar 236 or by starting earlier the one from bar 237. In the main text, we give the former due to its statistical advantage in similar places – 2 appearances (bars 232-233 and 238-239) to one (bars 234-235). The solution analogous to bars 234-235 may be considered an alternative interpretation of the slurs of FE (→EE). category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 238
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
We add a cautionary before d2 and a before b2 in the main text. The former was added in GE3, whereas the latter already in GE and EE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 238
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The missing wedge in the majority of the sources may be a consequence of the mistake of the engraver of FE who placed the mark provided for this bar probably 2 bars later, in bar 240. A wedge was added in GE3, perhaps following the mark in bar 240. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 239
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
FE (→GE1→GE2) is missing an accidental before the topmost note. A comparison with identical bar 237 proves an unquestionable oversight. A natural was added in EE, GE3 and FEH. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions , Omission of current key accidentals |
||||||
b. 240
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
We consider the wedge to be a mistake – it seems that it should have been placed two bars earlier. category imprint: Editorial revisions |