data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/73ecd/73ecd80c88ad44c39f3711b6bcc33ca9e1021267" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/75013/75013441a15e45e6f391d55c49aaf803f3dff8a4" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/57140/571405c7057401412640722d57e0f4262876af22" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/3075f/3075f31e8b155e01785c3a53896ad205598099cf" alt=""
b. 228-229
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The fingering added in FEH to the printed Chopinesque indications completes them in the most natural manner. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||
b. 230
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
We consider the version of FE (→GE1→GE2) to be erroneous due to the reasons mentioned in a very similar situation in bar 225. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , GE revisions |
||||||
b. 230
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The version of GE most probably resulted from an oversight of the engraver of GE1 – cf. analogous bar 249. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Errors in GE |
||||||
b. 230
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the main text, we add wedges to the quavers at the beginning of the bar, since their absence in FE (→GE) can be easily explained by an oversight related to the transition into a new line of text. The virtuoso character of the figuration and a clear analogy between the progression's segments in bars 228-230 make the articulation of those quavers clear. The mark in the R.H. was added in EE. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: EE revisions |
||||||
b. 230-231
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources |