|
b. 199-200
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
The five-quaver slur in bars 199-200 was probably added in the last phase of proofreading of FE, which is indicated by its absence in GE. Leaving the 2nd quaver in bar 200 without slur may suggest different possibilities of phrasing and articulation. However, it is most probably an inaccuracy of notation, since in similar motifs the note, in the vast majority of situations – both in FEpiano and in the sources of the orchestral part – is connected to the previous one with a slur. Due to this reason, in the main text we suggest adding a respective slur (in GE3, it was added as the only slur in this place). There is a similar situation in bar 444. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions , Authentic corrections of FE |
|||||||||
|
b. 203
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In FE, the grace notes in the R.H. are written a third higher than it would result from the L.H. part and all similar places (bars 173, 181, 189 and analog). The mistake was corrected both in GE and EE. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Errors in FE , Terzverschreibung error , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 204
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
..
In the 1st half of the bar, FE has different slurs for the R.H. and for the L.H. We unify them in the main text by changing the slur in the L.H. after the slur in the R.H. A similar change was introduced in EE and GE3; in turn, the missing slur in the L.H. in GE1 (→GE2) is almost certainly a mistake. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: EE revisions , Inaccuracies in FE , Errors in GE , GE revisions |
|||||||||
|
b. 204-205
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||||
|
b. 204-205
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III
category imprint: Differences between sources |
