Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


b. 132-136

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

..

In FE, there is no ​​​​​​​ before the 9th semiquaver in bars 132 and 136. The patent inaccuracy was corrected both in GE and EE.

category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources

issues: EE revisions , Accidentals in different octaves , Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions

b. 133-137

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

..

Precise slurring of this section (bars 128-143) is a result of Chopin's proofreading, whose traces are visible in FE in bars 133, 136 and 137 – the original slurs reached only just the fourth last semiquaver.  

category imprint: Corrections & alterations; Source & stylistic information

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 133

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Fingering written into FED

No teaching fingering

..

FED repeated here the Chopinesque fingering from identical bar 129. Since the entry does not provide new information, we do not give it in the main text.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED

b. 134

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Fingering written into FEH

No teaching fingering

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FEH

b. 136

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

Wedge in FE (→EE)

No mark in GE

..

The missing wedge is probably an oversight of the engraver of GE. There is a similar situation in bar 140.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE