Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main


Articulation, Accents, Hairpins

b. 361

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

No mark in FE (→GE,EE)

Accent suggested by the editors

..

The missing third accent is almost certainly an oversight – cf. bars 363 and 371.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 363

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

3 accents in FE (→EE,GE1GE2)

No marks in GE3

..

The omitted accents must be a mistake of GE3.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE

b. 364

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

No sign in FE (→GE,EE)

[] suggested by the editors

..

According to us, a  hairpin in the next bar and pairs of   marks in similar, two-bar passages in bars 356-357, 358-359 and 366-367 prove a highly likely oversight of the  mark in this bar. Therefore, in the main text we suggest a ​​​​​​​ mark after analogous bar 356.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

b. 365

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

​​​​​​​ in FE (→EE)

No sign in GE

​​​​​​​ suggested by the editors

..

The range of the  hairpin in FE (→EE) is questionable – it is disproportionately short to the descending part of the passage, which lasts the entire bar. A possible reason for that inaccuracy could be lack of space under the low-placed beam of the 3rd triplet in [A]. In the main text, we suggest a mark modelled after the more carefully marked passage in bars 356-357. The absence of the mark in GE is most probably attributable to an oversight.

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Scope of dynamic hairpins

b. 369

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt III

No marks in FE (→GE,EE)

Long accents suggested by the editors

..

The accents present in three similar bars – bars 361, 363 and 371 – make us consider the absence of respective marks in the discussed bar to be Chopin's oversight. At the same time, the presence of long accents in bars 368 and 371 suggests that Chopin could have envisioned long accents for the R.H. in the entire four-bar section (differently than in bars 360-363).

category imprint: Editorial revisions

issues: Long accents