|
b. 69
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||
|
b. 69
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||
|
b. 72
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The absence of the category imprint: Interpretations within context issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Omission of current key accidentals , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE |
|||||||
|
b. 72
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
category imprint: Differences between sources |
|||||||
|
b. 72-73
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The absence of the dots increasing the duration of the bass notes most probably results from an inaccurately implemented proofreading of FE, for in this edition, there are visible traces of correcting in print the first notes in the bar from the following notation: category imprint: Interpretations within context; Source & stylistic information issues: Inaccuracies in FE , Errors resulting from corrections , Authentic corrections of FE |
in sources
2 in the sources is almost certainly an inaccuracy in this context. Such imprecise notation of ornaments – grace notes, mordents, trills or turns – is a quite frequent phenomenon in Chopin's pieces, cf. e.g. the Nocturne in C
minor, op. 35, the 2nd mov., 
(with dots increasing the duration of notes). The unintentional character of the omission of the dots is proved by bar 75 in which a strictly analogous figure was printed already in the final layout and with a dotted minim.