mUltimate Chopin

Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

Text Compare Notes Sources Description
Select: 
Category
All
Graphic ambiguousness
Interpretations within context
Differences between sources
Editorial revisions
Corrections & alterations
Source & stylistic information
Notation
All
Pitch
Rhythm
Slurs
Articulation, Accents, Hairpins
Verbal indications
Pedalling
Fingering
Ornaments
Shorthand & other
Importance
All
Important
Main
Undo Clear

b. 67

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

Fingering written into FED

No teaching fingering
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FED

b. 68-69

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

Fingering written into FEH in bar 69

No teaching fingering

Fingering suggested by the editors in bar 68
..

In accordance with the General Editorial Principles, p. 17, in the main text we give the fingering written in FEH in bar 69 in bar 68.

category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FEH

b. 68

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

Fingering written into FES

No teaching fingering
..

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FES

b. 69

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

 in FE (→EE)

No sign in GE
..

The  mark, having the nature of a long accent, could have been added by Chopin in the last proofreading of FE (→EE), which is suggested by its absence in GE.

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Authentic corrections of FE

b. 69

composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II

cresc. in FE (→EE)

No indication in GE
..

The absence of both dynamic markings – see the previous note – suggests an oversight of the engraver of GE; however, it cannot be excluded that Chopin added them in the last phase of proofreading of FE (→EE).

category imprint: Differences between sources

issues: Errors in GE