|
b. 65
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The fingering in FEH naturally complements the indication in FES, whose authenticity is unquestionable, hence we include it in the main text. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Annotations in FES , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||||
|
b. 65
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The use of the 1st finger on the top note of the sixth was indicated in FEH only in this bar; however, it is definitely to be repeated in all four similarly structured figures of accompaniment in bars 64-67. The absence of such an indication in FES provides for a possibility of a different fingering, using the 2nd finger; however, according to us, it is also likely that the entries in this copy mark the same fingering described with more details in FEH. category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
|
b. 65-67
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The long accents at the beginning of bar 65 and 67, legible both in FE and GE, were reduced in EE to common, short accent. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Long accents , EE inaccuracies |
||||||||||
|
b. 66-67
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
category imprint: Differences between sources |
||||||||||
|
b. 66
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In the main text, we omit the additional slur over the quaver triplet – cf. General Editorial Principles, p. 16. category imprint: Editorial revisions issues: Triplet slurs |
