Issues : GE revisions
b. 103
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In FE (→EE,GE1→GE2), there is no restoring b2 in the 2nd group of grace notes and no restoring f1 in the last group in the L.H. These harmonically patent oversights of Chopin were corrected only in GE3 and, partially, in the pupils' copies: a was added in FES, a – in FEH. category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Annotations in FES , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE , Annotations in FEH |
||||||
b. 103
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
According to us, the missing staccato dots in this bar are to be considered an inaccuracy. The markings were added in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 103
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In all sources, this is the last bar on a page; in the part of the L.H., at the end of the line, a change of clef to treble should be indicated. However, the sign was added accordingly only in GE3. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 104-105
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The return to tempo is marked in FE (→EE) only in the solo part, in bar 105. Tempo 1o introduced a bar earlier in GE is most probably an editorial revision – cf. a similar situation in bar 52. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||
b. 108
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The pedalling of the majority of the sources must be erroneous – the pedal must be changed in the middle of the bar, together with the change of chord (cf. bar 106). See also the note on the marking. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |