Issues : GE revisions
|
b. 103
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In FE (→EE,GE1→GE2), there is no category imprint: Interpretations within context; Differences between sources issues: Annotations in teaching copies , Errors in FE , Omissions to cancel alteration , GE revisions , Annotations in FES , Errors repeated in GE , Errors repeated in EE , Annotations in FEH |
||||||||
|
b. 103
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
According to us, the missing staccato dots in this bar are to be considered an inaccuracy. The markings were added in GE3. category imprint: Differences between sources; Editorial revisions issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 103
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
In all sources, this is the last bar on a page; in the part of the L.H., at the end of the line, a change of clef to treble should be indicated. However, the sign was added accordingly only in GE3. category imprint: Source & stylistic information issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 104-105
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The return to tempo is marked in FE (→EE) only in the solo part, in bar 105. Tempo 1o introduced a bar earlier in GE is most probably an editorial revision – cf. a similar situation in bar 52. category imprint: Differences between sources issues: GE revisions |
||||||||
|
b. 108
|
composition: Op. 11, Concerto in E minor, Mvt II
..
The pedalling of the majority of the sources must be erroneous – the pedal must be changed in the middle of the bar, together with the change of chord (cf. bar 106). See also the note on the category imprint: Differences between sources issues: Inaccuracies in FE , GE revisions |
restoring b2 in the 2nd group of grace notes and no 
restoring f
1 in the last group in the L.H. These harmonically patent oversights of Chopin were corrected only in 
under 6th triplet in 
